The natural durability of wood species against rot has again become a matter of interest for the uses of wood as a natural material, while the use of synthetic fungicides is being debated. In the mid-20 th century, many experimental studies were performed in Europe and North America, using different standardised protocols. More than five hundred tropical wood species were tested in France between 1955 and 1990, with a total of 9,842 wood samples tested. It would seem useful to allow free access to all the data from these tests in the interests of a more comprehensive study of the natural durability of a wide range of wood species. The great majority (68%) of all these tests used two slightly different protocols with only a change in woodblock test dimensions. Roughly half of the species were tested under one of the two protocols, and the other half under the second. In addition, certain species were tested with both protocols. The dimensions of the test blocks, the fungal strain used, and the wood type (sapwood or heartwood) all give significantly different results, but the mean mass loss due to the 4 main fungal strains is a good predictor of the wood resistance to rot. Overall, mass loss for sapwood with each protocol is 45% higher than for heartwood of the same species. There is a significant positive correlation between the rot resistance of the sapwood and the heartwood, but the decrease from heartwood to sapwood is greater in durable wood species than in non-durable ones. Heartwood rot resistance was observed to be highly variable between trees of the same species, except in those classified as “very durable” and “non-durable”. This opens up possibilities for a classification of natural rot resistance for numerous useful types of timber that are often regarded as only moderately resistant because they include a small proportion of species with poor resistance. Each protocol group included over one hundred species for which density and chemical composition data