Barriers to Circular bioeconomy transitions in the agri-food waste system
Jacquet C., Teixeira Da Silva Siqueira T.. 2025. In : Towards ecological bioeconomy: Interrogating concepts and practices from the human and social sciences. Abstract of booklet. Reims : Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, p. 130-133. Colloque International Bioeco - Towards an Ecological Bioeconomy: Interrogating Concepts and Practices from the Human and Social Sciences (BIOECO2 2025), 2025-06-02/2025-06-04, Reims (France).
Introduction - Circular bioeconomy (CBE) is attracting increasing attention from public authorities and private stakeholders as a way to drive sustainable transitions in agri-food-waste systems (AFWS). Previous studies have identified various barriers to the development of a CBE including technological, cultural, political and organizational(Kirchherr et al., 2018).These barriers have primarily been studied at the scale of industrial sectors valorizing bio-based products (Chrispim et al., 2024; Neves and Marques, 2022). However, very few studies have examined the mechanisms of barriers and lock-ins underlying transitions through a CBE in AFWS (Chhetri et al., 2010; Magrini et al., 2016; Meynard et al., 2018). To address this gap, we sought to identify the barriers encountered in the development of CBE initiatives within the AFWS of Reunion Island. Methods - To this end, a comprehensive approach was employed to identify barriers hindering the development of CBE initiatives. A stakeholder mapping exercise, 44 semi-structured interviews, and a participatory workshop involving 30 AFWS stakeholders were conducted. For each initiative, barriers were identified and then grouped into different categories commonly found in the literature: technical, environmental, economic or organizational commonly found in the literature. Results - Among the 38 identified CBE initiatives, organizational barriers related with governance issues emerge as the primary challenge, surpassing technical, environmental, or economic barriers. The most frequently cited barriers include: i) a low degree of participation in collective actions (e.g., consumer awareness campaigns); ii) administrative burden; iii) tensions in actor dialogues; iv) inadequate regulations (e.g., ICPE(1) standards); v) difficulties in accessing financing; and vi) an increased workload associated with innovation development. Initiatives requiring strong coordination among stakeholders, such as the development of fodder banks,
Documents associés
Communication de congrès
Agents Cirad, auteurs de cette publication :
- Jacquet Clément — Es / UMR SELMET
- Teixeira Da Silva Siqueira Tiago — Es / UMR SELMET
